Skip to main content
TLI.

Indicator · TLI ind_gpp_per_capita

Gross Provincial Product Per Capita (Baht, Chain Volume Measures, Reference Year 2002)

ผลิตภัณฑ์ภาคและจังหวัดต่อคน (บาท, ปีอ้างอิง พ.ศ. 2545)

AS OF 31 DEC 2024THB/capita/yrWeight 1

Source

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC)

Thai government economic-planning agency; publishes Gross Provincial Product (provincial GDP equivalent). Refresh: annual; preliminary estimates land in late Q4 of the year following the reference year.

Goalposts

The 0-to-100 score for this indicator is normalized against fixed methodology goalposts. The values below define the band; click through to the methodology page for the framework that anchors them.

Score 100
350,000THB/capita/yr
Score 0
50,000THB/capita/yr
Direction
Higher is better
Anchor
Fitted to the Thai provincial distribution

Goalposts of 50,000 baht and 350,000 baht per capita were re-fit on 2026-05-05 when the source switched from the chain-volume series to current market prices. The 50,000 floor sits below Narathiwat (64,005 baht) so the floor is not artificially zero; the 350,000 ceiling tracks the 90th-percentile shoulder of the current-prices distribution. Seven provinces clip at the ceiling — Rayong, Bangkok, Chon Buri, Chachoengsao, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Prachin Buri, and Samut Sakhon. Clipping is policy-bounded by design.

Live distribution: 7 of 77 provinces clip at the score-100 ceiling.

Which Thai province leads on Gross Provincial Product Per Capita (Baht, Chain Volume Measures, Reference Year 2002)?

7 Thai provinces share the maximum TLI score of 100/100 on Gross Provincial Product Per Capita (Baht, Chain Volume Measures, Reference Year 2002); the strongest by raw value are Rayong, Bangkok, and Chon Buri (raw values from 592,335 to 942,205 THB/capita/yr). The bottom of the distribution is Narathiwat (64,005 THB/capita/yr, score 4.7/100).

Coverage

77 of 77 Thai provinces. Median score: 24.8. Each province's score is normalized 0–100 against fixed goalposts; a higher score is more favorable.

Reading the columns.Raw valuethe actual measurement in THB/capita/yr.Scorenormalized 0–100 against fixed methodology goalposts (not a percentile). Higher is better.Why ties?7 provinces share the score-100 ceiling because their raw values meet or exceed the upper goalpost. Provinces beyond the goalposts aren't separated further — that's the trade-off for fixed, year-over-year comparable scoring instead of percentiles.

Top scorers

RankProvinceRaw value (THB/capita/yr)Score
1Rayong942205100
2Bangkok675979100
3Chon Buri592335100
4Chachoengsao490005100
5Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya428870100

Lowest scorers

RankProvinceRaw value (THB/capita/yr)Score
77Narathiwat640054.7
76Nong Bua Lam Phu690086.3
75Mae Hong Son698286.6
74Mukdahan722517.4
73Yasothon773769.1
Show all 77 provinces rankedSorted highest to lowest score
RankProvinceRaw value (THB/capita/yr)Score
1Rayong942205100
2Bangkok675979100
3Chon Buri592335100
4Chachoengsao490005100
5Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya428870100
6Prachin Buri388559100
7Samut Sakhon374056100
8Saraburi34473498.2
9Samut Prakan32029490.1
10Nakhon Pathom31663688.9
11Phuket31492188.3
12Chanthaburi25352267.8
13Pathum Thani24646365.5
14Lamphun23661962.2
15Ratchaburi23151660.5
16Chumphon23031960.1
17Phangnga22921359.7
18Prachuap Khiri Khan22115157.1
19Nonthaburi21451554.8
20Surat Thani18818146.1
21Krabi17405841.4
22Samut Songkhram16716439.1
23Trat16483538.3
24Chai Nat15715935.7
25Phetchaburi15671935.6
26Kamphaeng Phet15540435.1
27Chiang Mai15492535
28Kanchanaburi15366234.6
29Lopburi15283134.3
30Sing Buri15175033.9
31Songkhla14779032.6
32Nakhon Sawan13918429.7
33Nakhon Ratchasima13786429.3
34Ang Thong13524828.4
35Khon Kaen13198727.3
36Nakhon Si Thammarat12740525.8
37Nakhon Nayok12643525.5
38Phitsanulok12488425
39Suphan Buri12448224.8
40Uthai Thani12394624.6
41Tak12153723.8
42Uttaradit12072023.6
43Loei11762422.5
44Trang11174620.6
45Satun11031220.1
46Phayao10927519.8
47Yala10810819.4
48Lampang10773219.2
49Nong Khai10758919.2
50Phichit10505418.4
51Chiang Rai10298817.7
52Phetchabun10093617
53Udon Thani10000516.7
54Ranong9933116.4
55Nakhon Phanom9673115.6
56Sukhothai9320814.4
57Buri Ram9163613.9
58Phrae9132413.8
59Si Sa Ket9106013.7
60Maha Sarakham9099613.7
61Surin8985213.3
62Nan8951513.2
63Phatthalung8709812.4
64Chaiyaphum8595112
65Amnat Charoen8570711.9
66Kalasin8478511.6
67Bueng Kan8402111.3
68Pattani8336911.1
69Ubon Ratchathani8289511
70Sa Kaeo8252610.8
71Roi Et8249110.8
72Sakon Nakhon788959.6
73Yasothon773769.1
74Mukdahan722517.4
75Mae Hong Son698286.6
76Nong Bua Lam Phu690086.3
77Narathiwat640054.7

Methodology

See the methodology page for the full TLI scoring approach, including how this indicator's category Cost & Economy combines with the other six categories via geometric mean.

Cite as: "Gross Provincial Product Per Capita (Baht, Chain Volume Measures, Reference Year 2002)." Thailand Livability Index, 2026. CC BY-NC 4.0.

Other indicators in Cost & Economy

Browse all indicators →