Indicator · TLI ind_tat_attractions_per_province
TAT-Registered Tourist Attractions Per 100,000 Population
จำนวนแหล่งท่องเที่ยวที่ขึ้นทะเบียนกับ ททท. ต่อประชากร 100,000 คน
Source
Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT Data API v2)
TAT's national registry of tourist attractions (place_category_id=3): temples, national parks, museums, historical sites, beaches, viewpoints, waterfalls, and cultural sites. Restaurants, accommodations, and shops excluded. Refresh: TLI re-pulls quarterly; upstream changes when TAT inscribes new sites.
Goalposts
The 0-to-100 score for this indicator is normalized against fixed methodology goalposts. The values below define the band; click through to the methodology page for the framework that anchors them.
- Score 100
- 20 attractions/100k
- Score 0
- 0 attractions/100k
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Anchor
- Fitted to the Thai provincial distribution
Goalposts of 0 and 20 TAT-registered attractions per 100,000 residents are fitted to the observed TAT Data API v2 distribution across 4,237 attraction-category places. The ceiling was raised from the provisional 15.0 after calibration showed twelve provinces clipping at 15; six provinces still clip at 20 (Ranong, Trat, Mae Hong Son, Phangnga, Samut Songkhram, Nakhon Nayok), all small-population provinces where attraction density genuinely saturates.
Live distribution: 6 of 77 provinces clip at the score-100 ceiling .
Which Thai province leads on TAT-Registered Tourist Attractions Per 100,000 Population?
6 Thai provinces share the maximum TLI score of 100/100 on TAT-Registered Tourist Attractions Per 100,000 Population; the strongest by raw value are Ranong , Trat , and Mae Hong Son (raw values from 24.24 to 30.13 attractions/100k). The bottom of the distribution is Bangkok (1.79 attractions/100k, score 8.9/100).
Coverage
77 of 77 Thai provinces. Median score: 37.9. Each province's score is normalized 0–100 against fixed goalposts; a higher score is more favorable.
Reading the columns. Raw value the actual measurement in attractions/100k. Score normalized 0–100 against fixed methodology goalposts (not a percentile). Higher is better. Why ties? 6 provinces share the score-100 ceiling because their raw values meet or exceed the upper goalpost. Provinces beyond the goalposts aren't separated further — that's the trade-off for fixed, year-over-year comparable scoring instead of percentiles.
Top scorers
| Rank | Province | Raw value (attractions/100k) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ranong | 30.13 | 100 |
| 2 | Trat | 26.6 | 100 |
| 3 | Mae Hong Son | 24.24 | 100 |
| 4 | Phangnga | 23.72 | 100 |
| 5 | Samut Songkhram | 21.05 | 100 |
Lowest scorers
| Rank | Province | Raw value (attractions/100k) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | Bangkok | 1.79 | 8.9 |
| 76 | Udon Thani | 2 | 10 |
| 75 | Surin | 2.51 | 12.5 |
| 74 | Buri Ram | 2.63 | 13.2 |
| 73 | Si Sa Ket | 2.64 | 13.2 |
Show all 77 provinces ranked Sorted highest to lowest score
| Rank | Province | Raw value (attractions/100k) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ranong | 30.13 | 100 |
| 2 | Trat | 26.6 | 100 |
| 3 | Mae Hong Son | 24.24 | 100 |
| 4 | Phangnga | 23.72 | 100 |
| 5 | Samut Songkhram | 21.05 | 100 |
| 6 | Nakhon Nayok | 20.41 | 100 |
| 7 | Ang Thong | 19.86 | 99.3 |
| 8 | Sing Buri | 18.18 | 90.9 |
| 9 | Phuket | 17.8 | 89 |
| 10 | Satun | 16.64 | 83.2 |
| 11 | Phrae | 15.81 | 79 |
| 12 | Chumphon | 15.59 | 78 |
| 13 | Lamphun | 14.94 | 74.7 |
| 14 | Uthai Thani | 14.42 | 72.1 |
| 15 | Nan | 14.09 | 70.5 |
| 16 | Mukdahan | 12.59 | 63 |
| 17 | Krabi | 12.17 | 60.9 |
| 18 | Phetchaburi | 11.77 | 58.9 |
| 19 | Prachuap Khiri Khan | 11.42 | 57.1 |
| 20 | Chai Nat | 11.23 | 56.1 |
| 21 | Uttaradit | 11.08 | 55.4 |
| 22 | Tak | 10.65 | 53.2 |
| 23 | Kanchanaburi | 10.59 | 53 |
| 24 | Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya | 10.09 | 50.5 |
| 25 | Loei | 10.01 | 50 |
| 26 | Phayao | 9.96 | 49.8 |
| 27 | Chanthaburi | 9.9 | 49.5 |
| 28 | Rayong | 9.5 | 47.5 |
| 29 | Sa Kaeo | 8.92 | 44.6 |
| 30 | Lampang | 8.74 | 43.7 |
| 31 | Sukhothai | 8.61 | 43 |
| 32 | Chiang Mai | 8.56 | 42.8 |
| 33 | Phichit | 8.18 | 40.9 |
| 34 | Chiang Rai | 8.18 | 40.9 |
| 35 | Ratchaburi | 8.12 | 40.6 |
| 36 | Prachin Buri | 7.77 | 38.9 |
| 37 | Trang | 7.74 | 38.7 |
| 38 | Saraburi | 7.67 | 38.4 |
| 39 | Suphan Buri | 7.58 | 37.9 |
| 40 | Nakhon Pathom | 7.12 | 35.6 |
| 41 | Bueng Kan | 6.94 | 34.7 |
| 42 | Phetchabun | 6.81 | 34 |
| 43 | Surat Thani | 6.6 | 33 |
| 44 | Chachoengsao | 6.54 | 32.7 |
| 45 | Lopburi | 6.51 | 32.5 |
| 46 | Yala | 6.47 | 32.4 |
| 47 | Amnat Charoen | 6.47 | 32.4 |
| 48 | Phatthalung | 6.37 | 31.9 |
| 49 | Nakhon Sawan | 6.35 | 31.8 |
| 50 | Chon Buri | 6.26 | 31.3 |
| 51 | Samut Sakhon | 6.13 | 30.6 |
| 52 | Pattani | 6.04 | 30.2 |
| 53 | Nong Khai | 5.88 | 29.4 |
| 54 | Nong Bua Lam Phu | 5.78 | 28.9 |
| 55 | Nonthaburi | 5.75 | 28.8 |
| 56 | Nakhon Phanom | 5.51 | 27.6 |
| 57 | Nakhon Si Thammarat | 5.1 | 25.5 |
| 58 | Kamphaeng Phet | 5.02 | 25.1 |
| 59 | Phitsanulok | 4.91 | 24.6 |
| 60 | Pathum Thani | 4.57 | 22.9 |
| 61 | Songkhla | 4.34 | 21.7 |
| 62 | Chaiyaphum | 4.27 | 21.3 |
| 63 | Yasothon | 4.21 | 21.1 |
| 64 | Narathiwat | 3.98 | 19.9 |
| 65 | Sakon Nakhon | 3.7 | 18.5 |
| 66 | Nakhon Ratchasima | 3.52 | 17.6 |
| 67 | Maha Sarakham | 3.14 | 15.7 |
| 68 | Kalasin | 3.03 | 15.2 |
| 69 | Samut Prakan | 2.96 | 14.8 |
| 70 | Khon Kaen | 2.94 | 14.7 |
| 71 | Roi Et | 2.91 | 14.6 |
| 72 | Ubon Ratchathani | 2.84 | 14.2 |
| 73 | Si Sa Ket | 2.64 | 13.2 |
| 74 | Buri Ram | 2.63 | 13.2 |
| 75 | Surin | 2.51 | 12.5 |
| 76 | Udon Thani | 2 | 10 |
| 77 | Bangkok | 1.79 | 8.9 |
Methodology
See the methodology page for the full TLI scoring approach, including how this indicator's category Lifestyle & Culture combines with the other six categories via geometric mean.
Cite as: "TAT-Registered Tourist Attractions Per 100,000 Population." Thailand Livability Index, 2026. CC BY-NC 4.0.