Indicator · TLI ind_flood_frequency
Provincial Cabinet-Resolution Flood-Aid Requests Per 100k Population (Annual)
ความถี่ของน้ำท่วม (เหตุการณ์ภัยพิบัติที่คณะรัฐมนตรีรับรอง ต่อประชากร 100,000 คน)
Source
Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation (DDPM)
Thai government department that records cabinet-resolution flood-aid declarations by province. Refresh: annual, after the fiscal-year close.
Goalposts
The 0-to-100 score for this indicator is normalized against fixed methodology goalposts. The values below define the band; click through to the methodology page for the framework that anchors them.
- Score 100
- 0 events/yr
- Score 0
- 5,000 events/yr
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Anchor
- Fitted to the Thai provincial distribution
Goalposts of 0 and 5,000 cabinet-resolution flood-aid requests per 100,000 population are fitted to the observed DDPM 2024 single-year baseline. Highland and southeastern provinces typically record zero declared events; flood-prone central plain and northern lowland provinces in extreme years can reach the upper end of the band. Bangkok scores zero requests by design — urban drainage, not a declared disaster. Multi-year rolling-window scoring resumes once portal coverage accumulates.
Live distribution: 4 of 77 provinces clip at the score-100 ceiling ; 24 of 77 clip at the score-0 floor.
Which Thai province leads on Provincial Cabinet-Resolution Flood-Aid Requests Per 100k Population (Annual)?
4 Thai provinces share the maximum TLI score of 100/100 on Provincial Cabinet-Resolution Flood-Aid Requests Per 100k Population (Annual); the strongest by raw value are Buri Ram , Roi Et , and Prachuap Khiri Khan (raw values from 1.1 to 0.2 events/yr). The bottom of the distribution is Nakhon Si Thammarat (23,716.9 events/yr, score 0/100).
Coverage
77 of 77 Thai provinces. Median score: 72.1. Each province's score is normalized 0–100 against fixed goalposts; a higher score is more favorable.
Reading the columns. Raw value the actual measurement in events/yr. Score normalized 0–100 against fixed methodology goalposts (not a percentile). Lower is better. Why ties? 4 provinces share the score-100 ceiling because their raw values meet or exceed the upper goalpost. 24 share the score-0 floor at the lower goalpost. Provinces beyond the goalposts aren't separated further — that's the trade-off for fixed, year-over-year comparable scoring instead of percentiles.
Top scorers
| Rank | Province | Raw value (events/yr) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buri Ram | 0.2 | 100 |
| 2 | Roi Et | 0.5 | 100 |
| 3 | Prachuap Khiri Khan | 1.1 | 100 |
| 4 | Saraburi | 1.7 | 100 |
| 5 | Kamphaeng Phet | 3 | 99.9 |
Lowest scorers
| Rank | Province | Raw value (events/yr) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | Nakhon Si Thammarat | 23716.9 | 0 |
| 76 | Pattani | 23376.3 | 0 |
| 75 | Phatthalung | 20603.2 | 0 |
| 74 | Songkhla | 19537.8 | 0 |
| 73 | Yala | 9580.3 | 0 |
Show all 77 provinces ranked Sorted highest to lowest score
| Rank | Province | Raw value (events/yr) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buri Ram | 0.2 | 100 |
| 2 | Roi Et | 0.5 | 100 |
| 3 | Prachuap Khiri Khan | 1.1 | 100 |
| 4 | Saraburi | 1.7 | 100 |
| 5 | Kamphaeng Phet | 3 | 99.9 |
| 6 | Kanchanaburi | 9.8 | 99.8 |
| 7 | Nakhon Phanom | 10.2 | 99.8 |
| 8 | Chon Buri | 10.6 | 99.8 |
| 9 | Nakhon Ratchasima | 11.7 | 99.8 |
| 10 | Maha Sarakham | 11.8 | 99.8 |
| 11 | Chachoengsao | 13.6 | 99.7 |
| 12 | Nong Bua Lam Phu | 14.7 | 99.7 |
| 13 | Ubon Ratchathani | 19.5 | 99.6 |
| 14 | Krabi | 21.7 | 99.6 |
| 15 | Samut Sakhon | 29.5 | 99.4 |
| 16 | Chaiyaphum | 37.2 | 99.3 |
| 17 | Khon Kaen | 46.5 | 99.1 |
| 18 | Mae Hong Son | 47.4 | 99.1 |
| 19 | Bueng Kan | 67.5 | 98.7 |
| 20 | Udon Thani | 78.4 | 98.4 |
| 21 | Chai Nat | 125.8 | 97.5 |
| 22 | Uttaradit | 135.5 | 97.3 |
| 23 | Trang | 181.9 | 96.4 |
| 24 | Phetchabun | 201.7 | 96 |
| 25 | Ranong | 265.5 | 94.7 |
| 26 | Sing Buri | 271.7 | 94.6 |
| 27 | Loei | 290.8 | 94.2 |
| 28 | Nakhon Sawan | 330.6 | 93.4 |
| 29 | Phitsanulok | 401.9 | 92 |
| 30 | Ang Thong | 403.5 | 91.9 |
| 31 | Chanthaburi | 411.7 | 91.8 |
| 32 | Uthai Thani | 422.6 | 91.5 |
| 33 | Nakhon Pathom | 493.1 | 90.1 |
| 34 | Phuket | 628.7 | 87.4 |
| 35 | Prachin Buri | 657.2 | 86.9 |
| 36 | Tak | 732.4 | 85.4 |
| 37 | Nakhon Nayok | 878.4 | 82.4 |
| 38 | Lampang | 1311.1 | 73.8 |
| 39 | Suphan Buri | 1393.9 | 72.1 |
| 40 | Phichit | 1519.6 | 69.6 |
| 41 | Satun | 1587.1 | 68.3 |
| 42 | Trat | 1622.4 | 67.6 |
| 43 | Sukhothai | 2147.5 | 57 |
| 44 | Chumphon | 2365.6 | 52.7 |
| 45 | Surat Thani | 2390.5 | 52.2 |
| 46 | Phayao | 2505.5 | 49.9 |
| 47 | Lamphun | 2526.9 | 49.5 |
| 48 | Chiang Rai | 2710.3 | 45.8 |
| 49 | Nong Khai | 2767.4 | 44.7 |
| 50 | Phrae | 3349.1 | 33 |
| 51 | Nan | 3870.9 | 22.6 |
| 52 | Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya | 4086 | 18.3 |
| 53 | Chiang Mai | 4317.4 | 13.7 |
| 54 | Bangkok | 0 | 0 |
| 55 | Rayong | 0 | 0 |
| 56 | Phangnga | 0 | 0 |
| 57 | Samut Songkhram | 0 | 0 |
| 58 | Phetchaburi | 0 | 0 |
| 59 | Samut Prakan | 0 | 0 |
| 60 | Nonthaburi | 0 | 0 |
| 61 | Ratchaburi | 0 | 0 |
| 62 | Pathum Thani | 0 | 0 |
| 63 | Lopburi | 0 | 0 |
| 64 | Sa Kaeo | 0 | 0 |
| 65 | Mukdahan | 0 | 0 |
| 66 | Si Sa Ket | 0 | 0 |
| 67 | Sakon Nakhon | 0 | 0 |
| 68 | Surin | 0 | 0 |
| 69 | Kalasin | 0 | 0 |
| 70 | Yasothon | 0 | 0 |
| 71 | Amnat Charoen | 0 | 0 |
| 72 | Narathiwat | 8543.7 | 0 |
| 73 | Yala | 9580.3 | 0 |
| 74 | Songkhla | 19537.8 | 0 |
| 75 | Phatthalung | 20603.2 | 0 |
| 76 | Pattani | 23376.3 | 0 |
| 77 | Nakhon Si Thammarat | 23716.9 | 0 |
Methodology
See the methodology page for the full TLI scoring approach, including how this indicator's category Environment & Climate combines with the other six categories via geometric mean.
Cite as: "Provincial Cabinet-Resolution Flood-Aid Requests Per 100k Population (Annual)." Thailand Livability Index, 2026. CC BY-NC 4.0.
Other indicators in Environment & Climate
- Annual Count of Days Exceeding WHO Daily PM2.5 Guideline
- Annual Count of Days With Maximum Temperature ≥ 35°C
- Percentage of Households With Inside Piped Water Supply on Premises
- PM2.5 Annual Mean Concentration
- Provincial Forest Cover Percentage (NSO / Royal Forest Department source)
- Provincial Solid Waste Management Performance
- Tree Canopy Coverage Percentage
- Wet Days Per Year (≥ 1 mm Rainfall)