Indicator · TLI ind_piped_water_pct
Percentage of Households With Inside Piped Water Supply on Premises
สัดส่วนครัวเรือนที่มีน้ำประปาภายในที่อยู่อาศัย (%)
Source
National Statistical Office (NSO)
Thai government statistical surveys (Household Socio-Economic Survey, Yearbook tables) on household water access. Refresh: annual for Yearbook tables; biennial for the Household Socio-Economic Survey series.
Goalposts
The 0-to-100 score for this indicator is normalized against fixed methodology goalposts. The values below define the band; click through to the methodology page for the framework that anchors them.
- Score 100
- 99% households
- Score 0
- 70% households
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Anchor
- Fitted to the Thai provincial distribution
Goalposts of 70 percent and 99 percent are provisional, pending the statbbi provincial-grain ingest in Phase 2. The band reflects the WHO/UNICEF JMP highest-tier service definition (piped water on premises) and the realistic spread across Thai provinces. Re-fit is scheduled for Phase 2 week 6 once the provincial source replaces the current regionally-imputed values. Provinces saturating at 99 percent share the score-100 ceiling by design.
Live distribution: 4 of 77 provinces clip at the score-100 ceiling.
Which Thai province leads on Percentage of Households With Inside Piped Water Supply on Premises?
4 Thai provinces share the maximum TLI score of 100/100 on Percentage of Households With Inside Piped Water Supply on Premises; the strongest by raw value are Bangkok, Samut Prakan, and Nonthaburi (raw values from 99.1 to 99.1 % households). The bottom of the distribution is Pattani (75.2 % households, score 17.9/100).
Coverage
77 of 77 Thai provinces. Median score: 69. Each province's score is normalized 0–100 against fixed goalposts; a higher score is more favorable.
Reading the columns.Raw valuethe actual measurement in % households.Scorenormalized 0–100 against fixed methodology goalposts (not a percentile). Higher is better.Why ties?4 provinces share the score-100 ceiling because their raw values meet or exceed the upper goalpost. Provinces beyond the goalposts aren't separated further — that's the trade-off for fixed, year-over-year comparable scoring instead of percentiles.
Top scorers
| Rank | Province | Raw value (% households) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bangkok | 99.1 | 100 |
| 2 | Samut Prakan | 99.1 | 100 |
| 3 | Nonthaburi | 99.1 | 100 |
| 4 | Pathum Thani | 99.1 | 100 |
| 5 | Chon Buri | 94.6 | 84.8 |
Lowest scorers
| Rank | Province | Raw value (% households) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | Pattani | 75.2 | 17.9 |
| 76 | Narathiwat | 75.2 | 17.9 |
| 75 | Yala | 75.2 | 17.9 |
| 74 | Phatthalung | 75.2 | 17.9 |
| 73 | Nakhon Si Thammarat | 75.2 | 17.9 |
Show all 77 provinces rankedSorted highest to lowest score
Methodology
See the methodology page for the full TLI scoring approach, including how this indicator's category Environment & Climate combines with the other six categories via geometric mean.
Cite as: "Percentage of Households With Inside Piped Water Supply on Premises." Thailand Livability Index, 2026. CC BY-NC 4.0.
Other indicators in Environment & Climate
- Annual Count of Days Exceeding WHO Daily PM2.5 Guideline
- Annual Count of Days With Maximum Temperature ≥ 35°C
- PM2.5 Annual Mean Concentration
- Provincial Cabinet-Resolution Flood-Aid Requests Per 100k Population (Annual)
- Provincial Forest Cover Percentage (NSO / Royal Forest Department source)
- Provincial Solid Waste Management Performance
- Tree Canopy Coverage Percentage
- Wet Days Per Year (≥ 1 mm Rainfall)