Skip to main content
TLI.

Indicator · TLI ind_piped_water_pct

Percentage of Households With Inside Piped Water Supply on Premises

สัดส่วนครัวเรือนที่มีน้ำประปาภายในที่อยู่อาศัย (%)

AS OF 31 DEC 2024% householdsWeight 1

Source

National Statistical Office (NSO)

Thai government statistical surveys (Household Socio-Economic Survey, Yearbook tables) on household water access. Refresh: annual for Yearbook tables; biennial for the Household Socio-Economic Survey series.

Goalposts

The 0-to-100 score for this indicator is normalized against fixed methodology goalposts. The values below define the band; click through to the methodology page for the framework that anchors them.

Score 100
99% households
Score 0
70% households
Direction
Higher is better
Anchor
Fitted to the Thai provincial distribution

Goalposts of 70 percent and 99 percent are provisional, pending the statbbi provincial-grain ingest in Phase 2. The band reflects the WHO/UNICEF JMP highest-tier service definition (piped water on premises) and the realistic spread across Thai provinces. Re-fit is scheduled for Phase 2 week 6 once the provincial source replaces the current regionally-imputed values. Provinces saturating at 99 percent share the score-100 ceiling by design.

Live distribution: 4 of 77 provinces clip at the score-100 ceiling.

Which Thai province leads on Percentage of Households With Inside Piped Water Supply on Premises?

4 Thai provinces share the maximum TLI score of 100/100 on Percentage of Households With Inside Piped Water Supply on Premises; the strongest by raw value are Bangkok, Samut Prakan, and Nonthaburi (raw values from 99.1 to 99.1 % households). The bottom of the distribution is Pattani (75.2 % households, score 17.9/100).

Coverage

77 of 77 Thai provinces. Median score: 69. Each province's score is normalized 0–100 against fixed goalposts; a higher score is more favorable.

Reading the columns.Raw valuethe actual measurement in % households.Scorenormalized 0–100 against fixed methodology goalposts (not a percentile). Higher is better.Why ties?4 provinces share the score-100 ceiling because their raw values meet or exceed the upper goalpost. Provinces beyond the goalposts aren't separated further — that's the trade-off for fixed, year-over-year comparable scoring instead of percentiles.

Top scorers

RankProvinceRaw value (% households)Score
1Bangkok99.1100
2Samut Prakan99.1100
3Nonthaburi99.1100
4Pathum Thani99.1100
5Chon Buri94.684.8

Lowest scorers

RankProvinceRaw value (% households)Score
77Pattani75.217.9
76Narathiwat75.217.9
75Yala75.217.9
74Phatthalung75.217.9
73Nakhon Si Thammarat75.217.9
Show all 77 provinces rankedSorted highest to lowest score
RankProvinceRaw value (% households)Score
1Bangkok99.1100
2Samut Prakan99.1100
3Nonthaburi99.1100
4Pathum Thani99.1100
5Chon Buri94.684.8
6Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya94.684.8
7Rayong94.684.8
8Samut Songkhram94.684.8
9Samut Sakhon94.684.8
10Saraburi94.684.8
11Phetchaburi94.684.8
12Trat94.684.8
13Prachuap Khiri Khan94.684.8
14Nakhon Pathom94.684.8
15Chachoengsao94.684.8
16Nakhon Nayok94.684.8
17Ratchaburi94.684.8
18Sing Buri94.684.8
19Chanthaburi94.684.8
20Prachin Buri94.684.8
21Ang Thong94.684.8
22Lopburi94.684.8
23Chai Nat94.684.8
24Kanchanaburi94.684.8
25Sa Kaeo94.684.8
26Suphan Buri94.684.8
27Chiang Mai9069
28Lamphun9069
29Phitsanulok9069
30Lampang9069
31Sukhothai9069
32Phrae9069
33Uttaradit9069
34Uthai Thani9069
35Phayao9069
36Nakhon Sawan9069
37Nan9069
38Phichit9069
39Chiang Rai9069
40Mae Hong Son9069
41Phetchabun9069
42Kamphaeng Phet9069
43Tak9069
44Nong Khai89.165.9
45Udon Thani89.165.9
46Nakhon Ratchasima89.165.9
47Khon Kaen89.165.9
48Loei89.165.9
49Ubon Ratchathani89.165.9
50Mukdahan89.165.9
51Chaiyaphum89.165.9
52Nakhon Phanom89.165.9
53Buri Ram89.165.9
54Si Sa Ket89.165.9
55Sakon Nakhon89.165.9
56Surin89.165.9
57Kalasin89.165.9
58Yasothon89.165.9
59Bueng Kan89.165.9
60Roi Et89.165.9
61Amnat Charoen89.165.9
62Nong Bua Lam Phu89.165.9
63Maha Sarakham89.165.9
64Phuket75.217.9
65Phangnga75.217.9
66Chumphon75.217.9
67Surat Thani75.217.9
68Krabi75.217.9
69Ranong75.217.9
70Songkhla75.217.9
71Satun75.217.9
72Trang75.217.9
73Nakhon Si Thammarat75.217.9
74Phatthalung75.217.9
75Yala75.217.9
76Narathiwat75.217.9
77Pattani75.217.9

Methodology

See the methodology page for the full TLI scoring approach, including how this indicator's category Environment & Climate combines with the other six categories via geometric mean.

Cite as: "Percentage of Households With Inside Piped Water Supply on Premises." Thailand Livability Index, 2026. CC BY-NC 4.0.

Other indicators in Environment & Climate

Browse all indicators →