Indicator · TLI ind_walkability_score

Provincial Walkability Score (Decay-Weighted Amenity Access)

คะแนนความเหมาะสมต่อการเดินเท้า (จาก OpenStreetMap)

AS OF 30 APR 20260–100 scoreWeight 1

Source

Volunteer-built world map (OSM); contains walkable-amenity points-of-interest, road network, and pedestrian features. Refresh: continuous upstream by community editors; TLI re-pulls quarterly.

Goalposts

The 0-to-100 score for this indicator is normalized against fixed methodology goalposts. The values below define the band; click through to the methodology page for the framework that anchors them.

Score 100: 1000–100 score
Score 0: 00–100 score
Direction: Higher is better
Anchor: Composite-internal scale (0 to 100 by construction)

Walkability is a composite-internal score on a fixed 0-to-100 scale, computed via decay-weighted amenity access on the OpenStreetMap network after the Walk Score family methodology (Front Seat n.d.; Carr et al. 2010; Pivo and Fisher 2010; Higgs et al. 2019). Because the sub-indicator is already 0 to 100 by construction, the goalposts are the natural endpoints of the scale. The provincial value is the multi-centroid average.

Live distribution: 11 of 77 provinces clip at the score-100 ceiling.

Which Thai province leads on Provincial Walkability Score (Decay-Weighted Amenity Access)?

11 Thai provinces share the maximum TLI score of 100/100 on Provincial Walkability Score (Decay-Weighted Amenity Access); the strongest by raw value are Chiang Mai, Bangkok, and Khon Kaen (raw values from 317 to 838 0–100 score). The bottom of the distribution is Amnat Charoen (3 0–100 score, score 3/100).

Coverage

77 of 77 Thai provinces. Median score: 31. Each province's score is normalized 0–100 against fixed goalposts; a higher score is more favorable.

Reading the columns.Raw valuethe actual measurement in 0–100 score.Scorenormalized 0–100 against fixed methodology goalposts (not a percentile). Higher is better.Why ties?11 provinces share the score-100 ceiling because their raw values meet or exceed the upper goalpost. Provinces beyond the goalposts aren't separated further — that's the trade-off for fixed, year-over-year comparable scoring instead of percentiles.

Top scorers

Rank	Province	Raw value (0–100 score)	Score
1	Chiang Mai	838	100
2	Bangkok	366	100
3	Khon Kaen	317	100
4	Phuket	307	100
5	Chiang Rai	203	100

Lowest scorers

Rank	Province	Raw value (0–100 score)	Score
77	Amnat Charoen	3	3
76	Phichit	3	3
75	Prachin Buri	4	4
74	Pathum Thani	4	4
73	Nakhon Nayok	7	7

Show all 77 provinces rankedSorted highest to lowest score

Rank	Province	Raw value (0–100 score)	Score
1	Chiang Mai	838	100
2	Bangkok	366	100
3	Khon Kaen	317	100
4	Phuket	307	100
5	Chiang Rai	203	100
6	Nan	133	100
7	Phitsanulok	120	100
8	Lampang	110	100
9	Phetchaburi	108	100
10	Ubon Ratchathani	104	100
11	Krabi	102	100
12	Udon Thani	91	91
13	Nakhon Ratchasima	79	79
14	Ranong	75	75
15	Chumphon	74	74
16	Mae Hong Son	70	70
17	Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya	69	69
18	Phayao	69	69
19	Trat	68	68
20	Nong Khai	68	68
21	Sukhothai	67	67
22	Lopburi	67	67
23	Rayong	65	65
24	Surat Thani	63	63
25	Si Sa Ket	59	59
26	Phrae	52	52
27	Trang	50	50
28	Chon Buri	45	45
29	Lamphun	44	44
30	Phatthalung	42	42
31	Kalasin	41	41
32	Prachuap Khiri Khan	40	40
33	Kanchanaburi	37	37
34	Loei	34	34
35	Nonthaburi	33	33
36	Surin	32	32
37	Kamphaeng Phet	32	32
38	Songkhla	31	31
39	Sakon Nakhon	31	31
40	Roi Et	30	30
41	Ratchaburi	29	29
42	Nakhon Phanom	28	28
43	Phangnga	26	26
44	Nakhon Pathom	24	24
45	Chanthaburi	24	24
46	Nakhon Sawan	24	24
47	Narathiwat	24	24
48	Nakhon Si Thammarat	23	23
49	Phetchabun	22	22
50	Samut Sakhon	21	21
51	Ang Thong	21	21
52	Buri Ram	21	21
53	Satun	20	20
54	Samut Prakan	18	18
55	Yala	18	18
56	Mukdahan	17	17
57	Saraburi	16	16
58	Uttaradit	16	16
59	Tak	16	16
60	Uthai Thani	14	14
61	Samut Songkhram	13	13
62	Suphan Buri	13	13
63	Nong Bua Lam Phu	13	13
64	Bueng Kan	12	12
65	Sing Buri	11	11
66	Chaiyaphum	11	11
67	Pattani	11	11
68	Chachoengsao	9	9
69	Yasothon	9	9
70	Chai Nat	8	8
71	Sa Kaeo	8	8
72	Maha Sarakham	8	8
73	Nakhon Nayok	7	7
74	Pathum Thani	4	4
75	Prachin Buri	4	4
76	Phichit	3	3
77	Amnat Charoen	3	3

Methodology

See the methodology page for the full TLI scoring approach, including how this indicator's category Connectivity & Transport combines with the other six categories via geometric mean.

Cite as: "Provincial Walkability Score (Decay-Weighted Amenity Access)." Thailand Livability Index, 2026. CC BY-NC 4.0.

Other indicators in Connectivity & Transport

Browse all indicators →